Vague and confusing guidance regarding marketing service agreements has been officially withdrawn.
Five years ago, a cloud of regulatory uncertainty fell over Marketing Services Agreements (MSAs) when former Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Director Richard Cordray expressed his opinion in a 2015 MSA Bulletin that any settlement service arrangement anticipating future referrals posed “substantial risks” under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA). The guidance was vague and confusing, but one thing was clear—the CFPB believed that MSAs were inherently illegal, and you had to prove that yours was not.
For all practical purposes, the 2015 MSA Bulletin was overturned in 2018 when the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected this restrictive interpretation of RESPA under a separate set of facts in the case of CFPB v. PHH Corp. Now it’s official. On October 7, one day before its five-year anniversary, the CFPB rescinded the MSA Bulletin as not providing the regulatory clarity needed on how to comply with RESPA. In the same blog post, it published Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) addressing MSAs and other referral fee issues under RESPA.
Part I of this series summarizes the MSA guidance provided in the CFPB’s new RESPA FAQs. Part II will summarize the FAQs related to gifts and promotional activities under RESPA.
Unlike the 2015 MSA Bulletin, the new FAQs make it clear that MSAs are not inherently illegal under RESPA:
“Entering into, performing services under, and making payments under MSAs are not, by themselves, prohibited acts under RESPA or Regulation X.”
The FAQs emphasize that an analysis of any MSA under RESPA depends on the facts and circumstances, and how it’s both structured and implemented. But if the MSA “reflects an agreement for the payment for bona fide salary or compensation or other payment for goods or facilities actually furnished or for services actually performed, the MSA or the conduct is not prohibited.”
This last statement (and the new FAQs) essentially bring back to the forefront the basic guidelines long set forth in the RESPA statute and regulations.
The FAQs state that an MSA can be unlawful if the facts and circumstances show that the MSA—as structured or implemented in form or substance—involves:
The CFPB emphasized in its announcement that MSAs remain subject to scrutiny, and that it remains committed to vigorous enforcement of Section 8 of RESPA. Other federal and state laws may also have restrictions that apply and should be consulted.
But the CFPB’s rescission of its 2015 MSA Bulletin confirms what the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals had ruled in 2018: RESPA allows you to pay for actual, necessary and distinct services—even if from a referral source—as long as you pay no more than the reasonable value of the services.
Sue Johnson is the former executive director of RESPRO, the Real Estate Services Providers Council Inc. She retired in 2015 and is now a strategic alliance consultant.
These Stories on Legal and Regulatory
REAL Trends has been The Trusted Source of news, analysis, and information on the residential brokerage industry since 1987. REAL Trends is owned and operated by HW Media.
Accessibility: We are making efforts to be ADA Compliant. Should you have any challenges or questions please contact us at (303) 741-1000.
No Comments Yet
Let us know what you think